EMAILS RELATING TO EVALUATIONS, APPRAISALS AND REPORTS
COMMISSIONED BY THE MHRA - FOI REQUEST 06/321
----- Original Message -----
From: "Viner, Jane" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 5:16 PM
Subject: MHRA FOI request 06/321
> Dear Mr Medawar,
>
> Thank you for your request for information under the
Freedom of
> Information Act.
>
> I confirm that work is currently underway on parts 1 and 2 of your
> request. However, I am contacting you in order to ensure that we fully
> understand the range of reports you are seeking in part 3 of your request.
> As you are aware, the Agency carries out a very large range of activities
> and, to enable us to deal with your request, we therefore would be
> grateful if you could define the range of activities for which you are
> seeking reports on.
>
> You are welcome to telephone me on 020 7084 2348 to discuss your request
> further.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
> Jane Viner
> Head of Medicines Information and Web Services
> Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
=====================================================
Reply: 09 October 2006: 09.42
- Dear Ms Viner,
FOI REQUEST 06/321
Thank you for your 6 October email. I appreciate that the Agency is
involved
in a wide variety of activities and had attempted to limit my original
request by specifying only major reports. In the light of your query, I
should now like to modify the original request.
Please will you provide: [a] totals of expenditure by the Agency, in each of
the years 2003 to 2006, on all significant reports and/or evaluations
relating to the Agency activities specified below, commissioned by the MHRA;
and [b] the titles of all such reports/evaluations received, the identity of
the individual(s) and/or organisations commissioned; and date (or expected
date) of delivery. I should like to receive this information about reports
primarily relating to:
· the image, or perceptions of, the MHRA
(including its committee and
advisory group functions)
· quality of service to customers and
relationships with major
stakeholders (including committees and advisory bodies)
· achieving Agency (including its committee and
advisory group
functions) transparency and accountability
· the need to promote useful drug innovation
and product development
· proposed and/or effected regulatory action
for established
medicinal products where the risk-benefit profile has changed significantly
· development of Agency (including its
committee and advisory group
functions) work relating to pharmacovigilance
· research directly relating to risks and
benefits of specific
products and medicines generally
· the MHRAs role as competent authority
for human blood and blood
components
· research relating to provision of drug
information to end users of
medicines;
· research relating to patient reporting of
suspected adverse drug
reactions; and
· other research directly related to
safeguarding public health
I hope this seems manageable, but you are welcome to telephone me on 020
7586 7771 if you would like to discuss this request further.
Sincerely,
Charles Medawar
CLICK HERE TO READ ON
HOME